The Multiplicity of the Foundations of Russian Classical Literature

Authors

  • Kotelnikov Vladimir Alekseevitch Professor, Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkinskij Dom) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52547/iarll.19.29

Keywords:

Russian Literature, Fundamentals of Literary Phenomena, Karamzin, Pushkin, Russian Classical Literature

Abstract

The article examines a number of ideological, social, ethical, aesthetic foundations on which the phenomena of Russian classical literature arose. Such foundations determined the content and form of literary phenomena. The work of Karamzin, Pushkin, and writers close to them developed on the basis of assimilation of European and Russian material, which took the form of cultural personalism. On the border of this basis, the works of Baratynsky and Tyutchev were created. Subsequently, there was a change of fundamentals. The tendencies of criticism, social problemativeness, and negativism have become predominant. Lermontov abolished Pushkin's measure of man and moved on to the hyperbolization of personality in the poet's self-consciousness and in the lyrical "I". The basis of Gogol's work was split into two parts. In the first part, works of Ukrainian themes were created. In the second part, Petersburg stories and "Dead Souls" grew up. Here the author's work was governed by socio-anthropological criticism. In the era of crises, ideological struggle, Leskov did not find solid foundations for his worldview and creativity, he found himself heavily dependent on current events and influences. This gave rise to internal and external conflict, style deformations. The trends of the 1860s - 1870s led Dostoevsky to a deeply ethical and philosophical problematization of man in his main novels. Chekhov's work reflects the tendencies of negativism of the late nineteenth century.

Extended abstract:

 

     The purpose of the article is to show on concrete historical and literary facts the discrete process of the movement of Russian literature from the end of the XVIII century to the beginning of the XX century. The working hypothesis consists in the assumption that every significant phenomenon of Russian literature of this period is largely autonomous. This autonomy refers to the origin of this phenomenon, to its special orientation to philosophical concepts, to artistic traditions. It is also assumed that the relationship between major literary phenomena is dominated not by continuity, but by conflict, confrontation. The confrontation takes place in the field of ideas, literary themes, and style. This formulation of the historical and literary problem is completely new in Russian philology. It should lead to a radical revision of the picture of literary development in this period. The research method in this case consists in analyzing the writer's work in a cultural context.

The article examines a number of ideological, social, ethical, aesthetic foundations on which the phenomena of Russian classical literature arose. Such foundations determined the content and form of literary phenomena. The work of Karamzin, Pushkin, and writers close to them developed on the basis of assimilation of European and Russian material, which took the form of cultural personalism. Subsequently, there was a change of fundamentals. The tendencies of criticism, social problemativeness, and negativism have become predominant. Lermontov abolished Pushkin's measure of man and moved on to the hyperbolization of personality in the poet's self-consciousness and in the lyrical "I". Gogol's work was governed by socio-anthropological criticism. In the era of crises, ideological struggle, Leskov did not find solid foundations for his worldview and creativity. The trends of the 1860s - 1870s led Dostoevsky to a deeply ethical and philosophical problematization of man. Chekhov's work reflects the tendencies of negativism of the late nineteenth century.

The considered material makes it possible to identify the formation of various ideological, socio-ethical, aesthetic foundations that determined the content of literary phenomena arising on them. The basis formed at the end of the XVIII - first third of the XIX century found expression in the cultural personalism of the Karamzin-Pushkin literary era, which clearly affected the poetry of poets of that time, including Boratynsky, Tyutchev. On a different basis, Lermontov's poetry developed with its hyperbolization of personality in the poet's self-consciousness and in his lyrical "I". The following foundations are dominated by the tendencies of criticism, social problemativeness, negativism, which are found in the works of Gogol, Leskov, and Chekhov. Dostoevsky's novels are based on a deep ethical and philosophical problematization of man.

References

- Богданович А.И. (1897). А. Б. [Богданович А. И.] Критические заметки // Мир Божий. 1897. № 1. Отдел II.

- Волынский А. (1892). Волынский А. Литературные заметки // Северный вестник. 1892. № 10.

- Гоголь Н.В. (1994). Гоголь Н.В. Собрание сочинений: В 9 т., Т. 5. М.: Русская книга.

- Достоевский Ф.М. (1973а). Достоевский Ф.М. Полное собрание сочинений: В 30 т., Т. 7. Л.: Наука.

- Достоевский Ф.М. (1973б). Достоевский Ф.М. Полное собрание сочинений: В 30 т., Т. 8. Л.: Наука.

- Леонтьев К.Н. (2005). Византизм и Славянство // Леонтьев К.Н. Полное собрание сочинений и писем: В 12 т., Т. 7. Кн. 1. СПб.: Владимир Даль.

- Лермонтов М.Ю. (1961). Лермонтов М.Ю.: Нет, я не Байрон, я другой… // Лермонтов М.Ю. Собрание сочинений: В 4 т., Т. 1. М.-Л.: Академии наук СССР.

- Переписка (1988). Переписка Н.В. Гоголя: В 2 т., Т. 2. М.: Художественная литература.

- Пушкин А.С. (1957). Пушкин А.С. Два чувства дивно близки нам… // Пушкин А.С. Полное собрание сочинений: В 10 т., Т. 3. М.: Академии наук СССР.

- Чехов А.П. (1975). Чехов А.П. Письмо к А.С. Суворину от 30 мая 1888 г. // Чехов А. П. Полное собрание сочинений и писем: В 30 т. Письма: В 12 т. Т. 2. М.: Наука.

- Чехов А.П. (1977а) Чехов А.П. Огни // Чехов А.П. Полное собрание сочинений и писем: В 30 т. Сочинения: В 18 т. Т. 7. М.: Наука.

- Чехов А.П. (1977а) Чехов А.П. Дуэль // Чехов А.П. Полное собрание сочинений и писем: В 30 т. Сочинения: В 18 т., Т. 7. М.: Наука.

- Чехов А.П. (1977б) Чехов А.П. Страх // Чехов А.П. Полное собрание сочинений и писем: В 30 т. Сочинения: В 18 т., Т. 8. М.: Наука.

Bibliography

- Bogdanovich A.I. (1897). A. B. [Bogdanovich A. I.] Kriticheskie zametki // Mir Bozhij. 1897. № 1. Otdel II.

- Volynskij A. (1892). Volynskij A. Literaturnye zametki // Severnyj vestnik. 1892. № 10.

- Gogol' N.V. (1994). Gogol' N.V. Sobranie sochinenij: V 9 t., T. 5. M.: Russkaja kniga.

- Dostoevskij F.M. (1973a). Dostoevskij F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 30 t., T. 7. L.: Nauka.

- Dostoevskij F.M. (1973b). Dostoevskij F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 30 t., T. 8. L.: Nauka.

- Leont'ev K.N. (2005). Vizantizm i Slavjanstvo // Leont'ev K.N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem: V 12 t., T. 7. Kn. 1. SPb.: Vladimir Dal'.

- Lermontov M.Ju. (1961). Lermontov M.Ju.: Net, ja ne Bajron, ja drugoj… // Lermontov M.Ju. Sobranie sochinenij: V 4 t., T. 1. M.- L.: Akademii nauk SSSR.

- Perepiska (1988). Perepiska N.V. Gogolja: V 2 t., T. 2. M.: Hudozhestvennaja literatura.

- Pushkin A.S. (1957). Pushkin A.S. Dva chuvstva divno blizki nam… // Pushkin A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 10 t., T. 3. M.: Akademii nauk SSSR.

- Chehov A.P. (1975). Chehov A.P. Pis'mo k A.S. Suvorinu ot 30 maja 1888 g. // Chehov A. P. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem: V 30 t. Pis'ma: V 12 t. T. 2. M.: Nauka.

- Chehov A.P. (1977a) Chehov A.P. Ogni // Chehov A.P. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem: V 30 t. Sochinenija: V 18 t. T. 7. M.: Nauka.

- Chehov A .P. (1977a) Chehov A.P. Dujel' // Chehov A.P. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem: V 30 t. Sochinenija: V 18 t., T. 7. M.: Nauka.

- Chehov A.P. (1977b) Chehov A.P. Strah // Chehov A.P. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem: V 30 t. Sochinenija: V 18 t., T. 8. M.: Nauka.

Published

2022-01-08

How to Cite

Котельников V. (2022). The Multiplicity of the Foundations of Russian Classical Literature. Issledovatel’skiy Zhurnal Russkogo Yazyka I Literatury, 10(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.52547/iarll.19.29

Issue

Section

Articles